1999-05-18                     Senate Journal                      Page 1655
HB 82                                                                        
Senator Taylor moved that the Senate rescind its previous action in            
adopting Amendment No. 1 to SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE                         
BILL NO. 82(JUD) An Act relating to certain claims arising out of              
or in connection with the year 2000 date change; amending Rule 23,             
Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective                
date.                                                                          
                                                                               
The question being: Shall the Senate rescind its previous action?              
The roll was taken with the following result:                                  
                                                                               
SCS CSHB 82(JUD) am S                                                          
Rescind Previous Action                                                        
                                                                               
YEAS:  12   NAYS:  8   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Parnell,                 
Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken                              
                                                                               
Nays:  Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Leman, Lincoln, Mackie,                   
Miller                                                                         
                                                                               
and so, the Senate rescinded its previous action.                              
                                                                               
The question being: Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted? The roll                 
was taken with the following result:                                           
                                                                               
SCS CSHB 82(JUD)                                                               
Amendment No. 1                                                                
                                                                               
YEAS:  8   NAYS:  12   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Adams, Ellis, Elton, Hoffman, Leman, Lincoln, Mackie,                   
Miller                                                                         
                                                                               
Nays:  Donley, Green, Halford, Kelly Pete, Kelly Tim, Parnell,                 
Pearce, Phillips, Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken                              
                                                                               
and so, Amendment No. 1 failed.                                                
                                                                               

1999-05-18                     Senate Journal                      Page 1656
HB 82                                                                        
Senator Mackie moved and asked unanimous consent that the bill be              
considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final            
passage. Without objection, it was so ordered.                                 
                                                                               
SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 82(JUD) was read                           
the third time.                                                                
                                                                               
The question being: Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE                           
BILL NO. 82(JUD) An Act relating to certain claims arising out of              
or in connection with the year 2000 date change; amending Rule 23,             
Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date           
pass the Senate? The roll was taken with the following result:                 
                                                                               
SCS CSHB 82(JUD)                                                               
Third Reading - Final Passage                                                  
Effective Date                                                                 
Court Rule                                                                     
                                                                               
YEAS:  19   NAYS:  1   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                              
                                                                               
Yeas:  Adams, Donley, Ellis, Elton, Green, Halford, Hoffman, Kelly Pete,       
Kelly Tim, Leman, Lincoln, Mackie, Miller, Parnell, Pearce,                    
Taylor, Torgerson, Ward, Wilken                                                
                                                                               
Nays:  Phillips                                                                
                                                                               
and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 82(JUD)                            
passed the Senate.                                                             
                                                                               
Senator Mackie moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote                 
on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective             
date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered.                             
                                                                               
Senator Mackie moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote                 
on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the Court Rule            
changes. Without objection, it was so ordered.                                 
                                                                               
Senator Phillips gave notice of reconsideration.